Just last month, Crispin Blunt MP, well known for his interest in legalising prostitution, declared the conviction of fellow Tory MP Imran Ahmad Khan for the sexual assault of a boy a “ miscarriage of justice”. So do Conservative colleagues Stephen Crabb, whose sexually explicit texts to a 19-year-old interviewee merely “fell short” of party standards Damian Green, demoted after sexual harassment and pornography allegations and Rob Roberts, readmitted – the whip only suspended – after sexually harassing a junior member of staff. David Warburton, reportedly accused by three women of sexual harassment, is similarly suspended, pending investigation. Since elaborating on his personal struggles, Jamie Wallis, Westminster’s first trans MP, appears to have been exonerated for his earlier association with a sugar daddy website (“Are you a student, a single parent or just short of money?”).
Matt Hancock’s excuse for pandemic priapism: “I fell deeply in love.” Johnson’s long history of workplace affairs with younger staff, right up to the one with a twentysomething favourite from party communications, we know about. It looked for a while as if porn enthusiast Neil Parish would loyally take a lead from his leader’s approach to party investigation and wait for an inquiry – this one to tell him if he liked perving at work. That was until he yesterday confessed to his “moment of madness”.
That leaves the Basic Instinct briefer who could reasonably expect colleagues to offer at least as much support as was extended to Charlie Elphicke, the convicted sex offender whose wife, Natalie, inherited his constituents. The Conservatives’ signature line in defending the indefensible originates, in fact, well before #partygate, when the whips rescinded Elphicke’s suspension (for being under investigation for sexual assault), so he could vote. The Sunday Times reported on the Elphicke cover-up that five senior Conservative MPs – Mrs Elphicke, Roger Gale, Theresa Villiers, Adam Holloway and Bob Stewart – were subsequently forced to apologise or be suspended from the Commons “for improperly trying to influence a judge” on his behalf, an act “corrosive to the rule of law”.
YOUNG JUSTICE GAY PORN COMICS PROFESSIONAL
So while not, as far as we know, rivalling Charing Cross police station for professional depravity, the ruling party demonstrates scarcely more interest in respecting either women or normal workplace boundaries. Young justice gay porn comic professional#
The existence of the latest porn connoisseur was exposed when female Conservative MPs complained to their chief whip about intolerable sexism and harassment, presumably over and above the eminent cases of which he will be aware. Is the Conservative party especially attractive to sexual miscreants or does it take formerly respectful men and make them that way? Whatever the process, it accords with Johnson’s great man theory of history that leadership by a devotee of covert asymmetrical relationships, someone with a documented view of individual women as assemblages of sexual characteristics, would only exacerbate its institutionally sexist culture. If Westminster harassment is now as pervasive as even Nadine Dorries can remember, it is hard to see this being corrected while Johnson, with as little moral authority on this subject as on any other, remains in office. Under him, his party would seem an outlier on extreme misogyny and sexual harassment if it weren’t so redolent of standards recently prevailing in the Metropolitan police.